Clearer, enforceable property rights are essential if China's fantastic 30-year boom is to continue...
The Economist
Does anyone else think there's something wrong with this statement?
Clearer, enforceable property rights are essential if China's fantastic 30-year boom is to continue...
The Economist
Does anyone else think there's something wrong with this statement?
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
0.054 seconds
That they’re planning for a boom, which will last exactly 30 years.
Willem / 12:33am / 21 March 2007
I meant that after 30 years of amazing growth the only way forward is apparently to abandon one of their central policies.
Ryan / 6:58pm / 21 March 2007