Leading active members of today's economics profession, the generation presently in their 40s and 50s, have joined together into a kind of politburo for correct economic thinking. As a general rule — as one might expect from a gentleman's club — this has placed them on the wrong side of every important policy issue, and not just recently but for decades. They predict disaster where none occurs. They deny the possibility of events that then happen. They offer a "rape is like the weather" fatalism about an "inevitable" problem (pay inequality) that then starts to recede. They oppose the most basic, decent, and sensible reforms, while offering placebos instead. They are always surprised when something untoward (like a recession) actually occurs. And when finally they sense that some position cannot be sustained, they do not re-examine their ideas. Instead, they simply change the subject.
James K. Galbraith
James is John's son, and seems to have inherited a fondness for reality.
Dani Rodrik has some good discussion along these lines as well: http://rodrik.typepad.com/
ben / 3:40pm / 30 May 2007
I read something that guy said recently. Can’t remember what it was. I’ll add him to my reader.
Ryan / 4:31pm / 30 May 2007